Commit 5ee6fe72 authored by wujing's avatar wujing

fix issue that output hoping not to have mis-match between CRC ind and RX in VNF-PNF mode

parent be5bbbd8
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ int16_t *primary_synch2_time;
#ifndef OCP_FRAMEWORK
PHY_VARS_UE ***PHY_vars_UE_g;
RAN_CONTEXT_t RC;
UL_RCC_IND_t UL_RCC_INFO;
//PHY_VARS_eNB ***PHY_vars_eNB_g;
//PHY_VARS_RN **PHY_vars_RN_g;
......
......@@ -924,7 +924,9 @@ void schedule_response(Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO) {
}
if ((NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MONOLITHIC) && do_oai && !dont_send) {
if(Sched_INFO->TX_req->tx_request_body.number_of_pdus > 0){
oai_nfapi_tx_req(Sched_INFO->TX_req);
}
oai_nfapi_dl_config_req(Sched_INFO->DL_req); // DJP - .dl_config_request_body.dl_config_pdu_list[0]); // DJP - FIXME TODO - yuk - only copes with 1 pdu
}
......
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -90,7 +90,27 @@ typedef struct{
} UL_IND_t;
// Downlink subframe P7
#define NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME 5
typedef struct{
/// harq indication list
nfapi_harq_indication_t harq_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
/// crc indication list
nfapi_crc_indication_t crc_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
/// SR indication list
nfapi_sr_indication_t sr_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
/// CQI indication list
nfapi_cqi_indication_t cqi_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
/// RACH indication list
nfapi_rach_indication_t rach_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
/// RX indication
nfapi_rx_indication_t rx_ind[NUM_NFPAI_SUBFRAME];
} UL_RCC_IND_t;
typedef struct{
/// Module ID
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment