Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
O
OpenXG UE
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Michael Black
OpenXG UE
Commits
8c0eb88e
Commit
8c0eb88e
authored
Jan 24, 2020
by
Raphael Defosseux
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/mutex_fix' into develop_integration_2020_w04
parents
8ca33282
4a2657ce
Changes
3
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
with
13 additions
and
11 deletions
+13
-11
executables/nr-gnb.c
executables/nr-gnb.c
+9
-6
executables/nr-ru.c
executables/nr-ru.c
+2
-2
targets/RT/USER/lte-enb.c
targets/RT/USER/lte-enb.c
+2
-3
No files found.
executables/nr-gnb.c
View file @
8c0eb88e
...
...
@@ -417,10 +417,14 @@ int wakeup_txfh(PHY_VARS_gNB *gNB,gNB_L1_rxtx_proc_t *proc,int frame_tx,int slot
// note this should depend on the numerology used by the TX L1 thread, set here for 500us slot time
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_FUNCTION_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_FUNCTIONS_UE_GAIN_CONTROL
,
1
);
waitret
=
wait_on_condition
(
&
proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
,
&
proc
->
cond_RUs
,
&
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
,
"wakeup_txfh"
);
AssertFatal
(
release_thread
(
&
proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
,
&
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
,
"wakeup_txfh"
)
==
0
,
"error releaseing gNB lock on RUs
\n
"
);
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_FUNCTION_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_FUNCTIONS_UE_GAIN_CONTROL
,
0
);
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_lock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
while
(
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
<
0
)
{
pthread_cond_wait
(
&
proc
->
cond_RUs
,
&
proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
);
// this unlocks mutex_rxtx while waiting and then locks it again
}
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
=
-
1
;
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_VARIABLE_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_VARIABLES_FRAME_NUMBER_RX0_UE
,
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
);
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_unlock
(
&
proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_unlock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_VARIABLE_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_VARIABLES_FRAME_NUMBER_RX0_UE
,
proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
);
...
...
@@ -446,7 +450,6 @@ int wakeup_txfh(PHY_VARS_gNB *gNB,gNB_L1_rxtx_proc_t *proc,int frame_tx,int slot
ru
=
gNB
->
RU_list
[
i
];
ru_proc
=
&
ru
->
proc
;
//AssertFatal((ret = pthread_mutex_lock(&ru_proc->mutex_gNBs))==0,"ERROR pthread_mutex_lock failed on mutex_gNBs L1_thread_tx with ret=%d\n",ret);
if
(
ru_proc
->
instance_cnt_gNBs
==
0
)
{
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_VARIABLE_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_VARIABLES_TRX_TST_UE
,
1
);
...
...
@@ -454,11 +457,11 @@ int wakeup_txfh(PHY_VARS_gNB *gNB,gNB_L1_rxtx_proc_t *proc,int frame_tx,int slot
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
gNB
->
proc
.
mutex_RU_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_lock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
gNB
->
proc
.
RU_mask_tx
=
0
;
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_unlock
(
&
gNB
->
proc
.
mutex_RU_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_unlock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
//AssertFatal((ret=pthread_mutex_unlock( &ru_proc->mutex_gNBs ))==0,"mutex_unlock return %d\n",ret);
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_VARIABLE_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_VARIABLES_TRX_TST_UE
,
0
);
return
(
-
1
);
}
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
ru_proc
->
mutex_gNBs
))
==
0
,
"ERROR pthread_mutex_lock failed on mutex_gNBs L1_thread_tx with ret=%d
\n
"
,
ret
);
ru_proc
->
instance_cnt_gNBs
=
0
;
ru_proc
->
timestamp_tx
=
timestamp_tx
;
...
...
executables/nr-ru.c
View file @
8c0eb88e
...
...
@@ -1343,11 +1343,11 @@ static void *ru_thread_tx( void *param ) {
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
L1_proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
);
AssertFatal
(
ret
==
0
,
"mutex_lock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
// the thread can now be woken up
//
if (L1_proc->instance_cnt_RUs == -1) {
if
(
L1_proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
==
-
1
)
{
L1_proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
=
0
;
AssertFatal
(
pthread_cond_signal
(
&
L1_proc
->
cond_RUs
)
==
0
,
"ERROR pthread_cond_signal for gNB_L1_thread
\n
"
);
//
} //else AssertFatal(1==0,"gNB TX thread is not ready\n");
}
//else AssertFatal(1==0,"gNB TX thread is not ready\n");
ret
=
pthread_mutex_unlock
(
&
L1_proc
->
mutex_RUs_tx
);
AssertFatal
(
ret
==
0
,
"mutex_unlock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_DUMP_VARIABLE_BY_NAME
(
VCD_SIGNAL_DUMPER_VARIABLES_FRAME_NUMBER_RX0_UE
,
L1_proc
->
instance_cnt_RUs
);
...
...
targets/RT/USER/lte-enb.c
View file @
8c0eb88e
...
...
@@ -512,17 +512,16 @@ int wakeup_txfh(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB,
continue
;
//hacking only works when all RU_tx works on the same subframe #TODO: adding mask stuff
}
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
ru_proc
->
mutex_eNBs
))
==
0
,
"ERROR pthread_mutex_lock failed on mutex_eNBs L1_thread_tx with ret=%d
\n
"
,
ret
);
if
(
ru_proc
->
instance_cnt_eNBs
==
0
)
{
LOG_E
(
PHY
,
"Frame %d, subframe %d: TX FH thread busy, dropping Frame %d, subframe %d
\n
"
,
ru_proc
->
frame_tx
,
ru_proc
->
tti_tx
,
proc
->
frame_rx
,
proc
->
subframe_rx
);
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
eNB
->
proc
.
mutex_RU_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_lock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
eNB
->
proc
.
RU_mask_tx
=
0
;
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_unlock
(
&
eNB
->
proc
.
mutex_RU_tx
))
==
0
,
"mutex_unlock returns %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_unlock
(
&
ru_proc
->
mutex_eNBs
))
==
0
,
"mutex_unlock return %d
\n
"
,
ret
);
return
(
-
1
);
}
AssertFatal
((
ret
=
pthread_mutex_lock
(
&
ru_proc
->
mutex_eNBs
))
==
0
,
"ERROR pthread_mutex_lock failed on mutex_eNBs L1_thread_tx with ret=%d
\n
"
,
ret
);
ru_proc
->
instance_cnt_eNBs
=
0
;
ru_proc
->
timestamp_tx
=
timestamp_tx
;
ru_proc
->
tti_tx
=
subframe_tx
;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment