Commit 863c469d authored by Eurecom's avatar Eurecom

bug fix for adjustable thread structure

parent 5f028730
......@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static void* tx_thread(void* param) {
phy_procedures_eNB_TX(eNB, proc, no_relay, NULL, 1);
if (release_thread(&proc->mutex_rxtx,&proc->instance_cnt_rxtx,thread_name)<0) break;
pthread_mutex_lock(&eNB_proc->ru_proc->mutex_eNBs);
++eNB_proc->ru_proc->instance_cnt_eNBs;
eNB_proc->ru_proc->timestamp_tx = proc->timestamp_tx;
......@@ -422,7 +421,8 @@ int wakeup_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB,RU_t *ru) {
RU_proc_t *ru_proc=&ru->proc;
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc_rxtx=&proc->proc_rxtx[0];//*proc_rxtx=&proc->proc_rxtx[proc->frame_rx&1];
proc->ru_proc = &ru->proc;
//proc->ru_proc = &ru->proc;
LTE_DL_FRAME_PARMS *fp = &eNB->frame_parms;
......@@ -839,7 +839,6 @@ void init_eNB_proc(int inst) {
//////////////////////////////////////need to modified////////////////*****
//printf("//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////**************************************************************** codingw = %d\n",codingw);
if(get_nprocs() > 2 && codingw)
{
init_te_thread(eNB);
......
......@@ -1168,6 +1168,7 @@ void wakeup_eNBs(RU_t *ru) {
for (i=0;i<ru->num_eNB;i++)
{
eNB_list[i]->proc.ru_proc = &ru->proc;
if (ru->wakeup_rxtx(eNB_list[i],ru) < 0)
LOG_E(PHY,"could not wakeup eNB rxtx process for subframe %d\n", ru->proc.subframe_rx);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment