Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
O
OpenXG-RAN
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Michael Black
OpenXG-RAN
Commits
f67a5aa0
Commit
f67a5aa0
authored
Jul 25, 2020
by
Aniq
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
linked the new unpack message fns in check_unpack_length()
parent
3d401150
Changes
5
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
5 changed files
with
40 additions
and
12 deletions
+40
-12
.vscode/launch.json
.vscode/launch.json
+2
-1
nfapi/README.md
nfapi/README.md
+22
-6
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
+9
-2
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
+1
-1
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
+6
-2
No files found.
.vscode/launch.json
View file @
f67a5aa0
...
...
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@
"/home/glab/NR_nfapi/openairinterface5g/targets/PROJECTS/GENERIC-LTE-EPC/CONF/gnb.band78.tm1.106PRB.usrpx300.conf"
,
"--rfsim"
,
"--rfsimulator.serveraddr"
,
"server"
],
"server"
,
"--phy-test"
],
"stopAtEntry"
:
false
,
"cwd"
:
"${workspaceFolder}"
,
"environment"
:
[],
...
...
nfapi/README.md
View file @
f67a5aa0
...
...
@@ -39,20 +39,36 @@ sudo <oai_codebase>/cmake_targets/ran_build/build/nr-softmodem -O <oai_codebase>
*
`unpack_tx_data_request`
*
Similarly change all the
`unpack`
functions within the switch-case block.
*
Modify the behaviour of
`check_unpack_length()`
for the new
`TAGS`
*
this is where the unpack functions are called
*
`dl_tti_request`
[x]
*
`ul_tti_request`
*
`ul_dci_request`
*
`tx_data_request`
### Task-C
*
Write the
`dl_tti`
alternative for
`nfapi_vnf_p7_dl_config_req()`
in
`vnf_p7_interface.c`
and other such functions.
*
Also check the function
`vnf_p7_pack_and_send_p7_msg()`
in
`vnf_p7.c`
for upgrade.
*
Write the
`dl_tti`
equivalent for
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
in
`nfapi_vnf.c`
and other such functions.
*
Check if
`nr_schedule_response()`
needs to be upgraded
*
Write the
`ul_tti`
alternative for
`nfapi_vnf_p7_ul_config_req()`
in
`vnf_p7_interface.c`
and other such functions.
*
`dl_tti`
is present as
`nr_dl_config`
[x]
*
`ul_tti`
*
`ul_dci`
*
`tx_data`
*
Resolve the hard-coded areas in source code. [
`HIGH-PRIORITY`
] [x]
*
Check whether the code can support latency of 0.5 ms for oai_slot_indication
*
Write the
`ul_tti`
equivalent for
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
in
`nfapi_vnf.c`
and other such functions.
*
`dl_tti`
is present as
`nr_dl_config`
[x]
*
`ul_tti`
*
`ul_dci`
*
`tx_data`
*
Check if
`nr_schedule_response()`
needs to be upgraded [x]
*
only a couple of
`NFAPI_MODE!=VNF_MODE`
checks
*can be added*
before calling the functions to handle PDUs
*
we need to add
`NFAPI_MODE!=MONOLITHIC`
checks before
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
and other such fns [x]
*
Sync with the latest stable commit in
`develop`
branch [
`LOW-PRIORITY`
]
*
check deviations
### Testing
*
Test by running VNF on a terminal and PNF in rfsim parallely
*
If all works fine, move to UE testing.
*
Check if the
`FAPI`
core functionality is not broken by running gNB in monolithic mode
*
Sync with the latest stable commit in
`develop`
branch [
`HIGH-PRIORITY`
]
*
Check whether the code can support latency of 0.5 ms for oai_slot_indication
*
Testing with a UE
*
Run VNF
...
...
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
View file @
f67a5aa0
...
...
@@ -6858,14 +6858,21 @@ int nfapi_p7_message_unpack(void *pMessageBuf, uint32_t messageBufLen, void *pUn
// look for the specific message
switch
(
pMessageHeader
->
message_id
)
{
{
case
NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST
:
if
(
check_unpack_length
(
NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST
,
unpackedBufLen
))
result
=
unpack_dl_tti_request
(
&
pReadPackedMessage
,
end
,
pMessageHeader
,
config
);
else
return
-
1
;
break
;
#if 0
case NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_REQUEST:
if (check_unpack_length(NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_REQUEST, unpackedBufLen))
result = unpack_dl_config_request(&pReadPackedMessage, end, pMessageHeader, config);
else
return -1;
break;
#endif
case
NFAPI_UL_CONFIG_REQUEST
:
if
(
check_unpack_length
(
NFAPI_UL_CONFIG_REQUEST
,
unpackedBufLen
))
result
=
unpack_ul_config_request
(
&
pReadPackedMessage
,
end
,
pMessageHeader
,
config
);
...
...
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
View file @
f67a5aa0
...
...
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ int pnf_p7_slot_ind(pnf_p7_t* pnf_p7, uint16_t phy_id, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sl
// If we ever need to "send" a dummy ul_config this won't work!!!
// send_dummy_subframe(pnf_p7, sfn_sf_tx);
send_dummy_slot
(
pnf_p7
,
sfn_tx
,
slot_tx
);
//
send_dummy_slot(pnf_p7, sfn_tx, slot_tx);
}
...
...
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
View file @
f67a5aa0
...
...
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
switch
(
dl_tti_pdu
->
PDUType
)
{
case
NFAPI_NR_DL_TTI_SSB_PDU_TYPE
:
gNB
->
pbch_configured
=
1
;
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nr_nfapi_ssb_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
dl_tti_pdu
);
...
...
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
case
NFAPI_NR_DL_TTI_PDCCH_PDU_TYPE
:
AssertFatal
(
pdcch_received
==
0
,
"pdcch_received is not 0, we can only handle one PDCCH PDU per slot
\n
"
);
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nfapi_nr_pdcch_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
&
dl_tti_pdu
->
pdcch_pdu
);
...
...
@@ -191,13 +192,16 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
AssertFatal
(
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
num_TLV
==
1
,
"TX_req->pdu_list[%d].num_TLV %d != 1
\n
"
,
pduIndex
,
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
num_TLV
);
uint8_t
*
sdu
=
(
uint8_t
*
)
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
TLVs
[
0
].
value
.
direct
;
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nr_nfapi_pdsch_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
&
dl_tti_pdu
->
pdsch_pdu
,
sdu
);
}
}
}
if
(
UL_tti_req
!=
NULL
)
memcpy
(
&
gNB
->
UL_tti_req
,
UL_tti_req
,
sizeof
(
nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t
));
if
(
UL_tti_req
!=
NULL
)
memcpy
(
&
gNB
->
UL_tti_req
,
UL_tti_req
,
sizeof
(
nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t
));
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) //should we enclose the for in this?
for
(
int
i
=
0
;
i
<
number_ul_dci_pdu
;
i
++
)
{
handle_nfapi_nr_ul_dci_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment