Commit 6a2b312a authored by Thomas Laurent's avatar Thomas Laurent

Update SW_archi.md

parent 5d2fa926
......@@ -312,17 +312,20 @@ Current status of new implementation: not tested, X2 not developped, 5G new GTP
ocp_gtpv1uTask(): this creates only the thread, doesn't configure anything
gtpv1Init(): creates a listening socket to Linux for a given reception and select a local IP address
newGtpuCreateTunnel() this function will replace the xxx_create_tunnel_xxx() for various cases
This creates a outgoing context for a teid (in input), it computes and return the incoming teid that will be used for incoming packets
These teids and in a "instance", so in a Linux socket: same teid can co-exist for different sockets
Remain here a lack to fill: the information given in the legacy funtions is not enough to fullfil the data needed by the callback
stuff like enb_flag, but also mui and more important data are not given explicitly by any legacy function (gtpv1u_create_s1u_tunnel), but the legacy and the new interface to lower layer (like pdcp) require this data.
The datamodel is still not fully understood, so this data source remain unknown
A new parameter is the callback function: will be pdpcp_data_req() and gtpv_data_req() (x2 case) for existing implementation and later other call backs like the F1-U implementation.
newGtpuCreateTunnel()
this function will replace the xxx_create_tunnel_xxx() for various cases
The parameters are:
1. outgoing TEid, associated with outpoing pair(rnti, id)
2. incoming packets callback, incoming pair(rnti,id) and a callback function for incoming data
This function creates a outgoing context for a teid (given as function input), a pair(rnti,outgoing id). Each outgoing packet received on GTP-U ITTI queue must match one pair(rnti,id), so the gtp-u thread can lookup the related TEid and use it to encode the outpoing GTP-U tunneled packet.
incoming packets
the gtp layer retrieves the data, the teid, find out the related data: rnti, bearer and quite a lot of other parameters (not clear why, because it looks like all is statefull, so the lower layer should have the context)
if lower layers can be stateless, it is a good idea to keep the context in the gtp layer and pass it to the callback, but the design remain obfuscated.
It also computes and return the incoming teid that will be used for incoming packets.
When a incoming packet arrives on this incoming teid, the GTP-U thread calls the defined callback, with the associated pair(rnti, incoming id).
stuff like enb_flag, mui and more important data are not given explicitly by any legacy function (gtpv1u_create_s1u_tunnel), but the legacy and the new interface to lower layer (like pdcp) require this data. We hardcode it in first version.
These teids and "instance", so in a Linux socket: same teid can co-exist for different sockets
Remain here a lack to fill: the information given in the legacy funtions is not enough to fullfil the data needed by the callback
# NGAP
NGAP would be a itti thread as is S1AP (+twin thread SCTP that is almost void processing)?
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment