Commit 3492f604 authored by wujing's avatar wujing Committed by Haruki NAOI

Fix: dlsch RBG allocation issue.

parent a4214072
...@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ void dlsch_scheduler_pre_processor_fairRR (module_id_t Mod_id, ...@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ void dlsch_scheduler_pre_processor_fairRR (module_id_t Mod_id,
// uint16_t r1=0; // uint16_t r1=0;
uint8_t CC_id; uint8_t CC_id;
UE_list_t *UE_list = &RC.mac[Mod_id]->UE_list; UE_list_t *UE_list = &RC.mac[Mod_id]->UE_list;
int N_RB_DL;
UE_sched_ctrl_t *ue_sched_ctl; UE_sched_ctrl_t *ue_sched_ctl;
// int rrc_status = RRC_IDLE; // int rrc_status = RRC_IDLE;
COMMON_channels_t *cc; COMMON_channels_t *cc;
...@@ -640,7 +641,18 @@ void dlsch_scheduler_pre_processor_fairRR (module_id_t Mod_id, ...@@ -640,7 +641,18 @@ void dlsch_scheduler_pre_processor_fairRR (module_id_t Mod_id,
average_rbs_per_user[CC_id] = 0; average_rbs_per_user[CC_id] = 0;
cc = &RC.mac[Mod_id]->common_channels[CC_id]; cc = &RC.mac[Mod_id]->common_channels[CC_id];
// Get total available RBS count and total UE count // Get total available RBS count and total UE count
temp_total_rbs_count = RC.mac[Mod_id]->eNB_stats[CC_id].available_prbs; N_RB_DL = to_prb(cc->mib->message.dl_Bandwidth);
temp_total_rbs_count = 0;
for(uint8_t rbg_i = 0;rbg_i < N_RBG[CC_id];rbg_i++ ){
if(rballoc_sub[CC_id][rbg_i] == 0){
if((rbg_i == N_RBG[CC_id] -1) &&
((N_RB_DL == 25) || (N_RB_DL == 50))){
temp_total_rbs_count += (min_rb_unit[CC_id] -1);
}else{
temp_total_rbs_count += min_rb_unit[CC_id];
}
}
}
temp_total_ue_count = dlsch_ue_select[CC_id].ue_num; temp_total_ue_count = dlsch_ue_select[CC_id].ue_num;
for (i = 0; i < dlsch_ue_select[CC_id].ue_num; i++) { for (i = 0; i < dlsch_ue_select[CC_id].ue_num; i++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment