Skip to content

O
OpenXG-RAN
An error occurred fetching the project authors.
Switch branch/tag
  1. 24 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  3. 17 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  5. 15 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  7. 06 Apr, 2016 1 commit
  9. 27 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  11. 25 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  13. 21 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  15. 15 Feb, 2016 1 commit
  17. 06 Jan, 2016 1 commit
  19. 18 Dec, 2015 2 commits
  21. 04 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  23. 26 Nov, 2015 1 commit
  25. 25 Nov, 2015 1 commit
  27. 24 Nov, 2015 3 commits
  29. 23 Nov, 2015 1 commit
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      Manage free downlink HARQ processes with a circular list. · f14a401f
      Cedric Roux authored 
      The oldest PID (the PID that was used the longest
TTI ago) is at the head and is the next one that
will be used.

No test is done to check that when a process is
allocated it is at least N TTIs old, but some quick
thinking strongly leads to the 'conclusion' that N
won't be smaller than 8, which seems to be what
cat3 UEs require to function properly in the downlink
direction (from the eNodeB to the UE).
      f14a401f
  31. 18 Nov, 2015 1 commit
  33. 10 Nov, 2015 2 commits
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      Give a better name to this array. · 68249569
      Cedric Roux authored
      68249569
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      This is a very basic fix, more work is needed. · f2b3597b
      Cedric Roux authored 
      The problem seems that we reuse HARQ processes too early.
For example, at subframe 0 we allocate PID 0. At subframe 4
we receive an ACK. At subframe 5 we may well reallocate this
PID. It seems category 3 UEs don't like that. They expect
some delay. How much? I don't know. 8 maybe, as for UL.

This commit forces allocation of HARQ PID:
  0 on subframe 1,
  1 on subframe 2,
  2 on subframe 3,
  3 on subframe 4,
  4 on subframe 6,
  5 on subframe 7,
  6 on subframe 8,
  7 on subframe 9.

We don't use subframes 0 and 5 (for initial transmission at
least). (Current develop branch doesn't either I think.)

This is not a good solution, just a quick and dirty one. With this
commit I can achieve 12Mbps with iperf UDP on a 5MHz band 7 carrier
with a cat3 UE. And more than 11Mbps with iperf TCP. And a bad
radio link.

We may want to implement some sort of free-list and take the
oldest PID in there, if it is older than let's say 8 subframes
(that is: the last transmission with this pid was done more
than 8 subframes ealier). We may well have no free PID if a
lot of retransmissions are done.
      f2b3597b
  35. 19 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  37. 06 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  39. 02 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  41. 21 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  43. 07 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  45. 04 Sep, 2015 1 commit
  47. 19 Aug, 2015 1 commit
  49. 18 Aug, 2015 1 commit
  51. 28 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  53. 21 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  55. 13 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  57. 20 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  59. 19 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  61. 18 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  63. 10 Jun, 2015 4 commits
  65. 08 Jun, 2015 1 commit