Commit 74cf68bf authored by Francesco Mani's avatar Francesco Mani Committed by r.karey

make ue and physim compile again

parent 388544db
......@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv){
uint8_t config_period;
int prachOccasion = 0;
double DS_TDL = .03;
uint16_t RA_sfn_index = -1;
uint8_t N_RA_slot,config_period = 1;
// int8_t interf1=-19,interf2=-19;
// uint8_t abstraction_flag=0,calibration_flag=0;
......
......@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ int get_nr_prach_info_from_index(uint8_t index,
uint8_t *N_dur,
uint16_t *RA_sfn_index,
uint8_t *N_RA_slot,
uint8_t *config_period);
uint8_t *config_period);
int get_nr_prach_occasion_info_from_index(uint8_t index,
uint32_t pointa,
......
......@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ void find_SSB_and_RO_available(module_id_t module_idP) {
&N_t_slot,
&N_dur,
&N_RA_slot,
&N_RA_sfn,
&max_association_period);
&N_RA_sfn,
&max_association_period);
float num_ssb_per_RO = ssb_per_rach_occasion[cfg->prach_config.ssb_per_rach.value];
uint8_t fdm = cfg->prach_config.num_prach_fd_occasions.value;
......@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ void schedule_nr_prach(module_id_t module_idP, frame_t frameP, sub_frame_t slotP
uint8_t config_index = scc->uplinkConfigCommon->initialUplinkBWP->rach_ConfigCommon->choice.setup->rach_ConfigGeneric.prach_ConfigurationIndex;
uint8_t mu,N_dur,N_t_slot,start_symbol = 0,N_RA_slot;
uint16_t RA_sfn_index = -1;
uint8_t config_period = 1;
uint8_t config_period = 1;
uint16_t format;
int slot_index = 0;
uint16_t prach_occasion_id = -1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment