Fixed bug with ue->dlsch_rx_sldch memory allocation

openair1/PHY/INIT/lte_init_ue.c

@@ -1060,9 +1060,9 @@ void init_lte_ue_transport(PHY_VARS_UE *ue,int abstraction_flag) {
   //***/ Substituted the next line with the double for loop as harq_ids is a 2-dimension array now
   //for (i=0;i<10;i++) ue->dlsch_sldch->harq_ids[i] = 0;
 
-  LTE_eNB_DLSCH_t  *dlsch_sldch_tmp = &ue->dlsch_sldch;
+  //LTE_eNB_DLSCH_t  *dlsch_sldch_tmp = &ue->dlsch_sldch;
   for (i=0; i<20; i++)
-	  dlsch_sldch_tmp->harq_ids[i/10][i%10] = 0;
+	  ue->dlsch_sldch->harq_ids[i/10][i%10] = 0;
 
 
   ue->dlsch_rx_slsch = new_ue_dlsch(1,4,NSOFT,1,MAX_TURBO_ITERATIONS,ue->frame_parms.N_RB_DL, abstraction_flag);
@@ -1072,9 +1072,9 @@ void init_lte_ue_transport(PHY_VARS_UE *ue,int abstraction_flag) {
   //Panos: Substituted the next line with the double for loop as harq_ids is a 2-dimension array now
   //for (i=0;i<10;i++) ue->dlsch_slsch->harq_ids[i] = 0;
 
-  LTE_eNB_DLSCH_t  *dlsch_slsch_tmp = &ue->dlsch_slsch;
+  //LTE_eNB_DLSCH_t  *dlsch_slsch_tmp = &ue->dlsch_slsch;
   for (i=0; i<20; i++)
-	  dlsch_slsch_tmp->harq_ids[i/10][i%10] = 0;
+	  ue->dlsch_slsch->harq_ids[i/10][i%10] = 0;
 
   ue->slsch_txcnt = 0;
   ue->slsch_errors = 0;