Commit 234acfea authored by Cedric Roux's avatar Cedric Roux

fix: this piece of code should not be here

It was probably the result of a bad merge.

At this point eNB_inst is not valid. Plus the T_ENB_MASTER_TICK
is now handled in lte-enb.c, even for oaisim.
parent 9c6cb96b
...@@ -764,23 +764,6 @@ l2l1_task (void *args_p) ...@@ -764,23 +764,6 @@ l2l1_task (void *args_p)
current_UE_rx_timestamp[UE_inst][CC_id] += PHY_vars_UE_g[UE_inst][CC_id]->frame_parms.samples_per_tti; current_UE_rx_timestamp[UE_inst][CC_id] += PHY_vars_UE_g[UE_inst][CC_id]->frame_parms.samples_per_tti;
} }
if (oai_emulation.info.cli_start_enb[eNB_inst] != 0) {
T(T_ENB_MASTER_TICK, T_INT(eNB_inst), T_INT(frame % 1024), T_INT(slot/2));
/*
LOG_D(EMU,
"PHY procedures eNB %d for frame %d, slot %d (subframe TX %d, RX %d) TDD %d/%d Nid_cell %d\n",
eNB_inst,
frame%MAX_FRAME_NUMBER,
2*sf,
PHY_vars_eNB_g[eNB_inst][0]->proc[slot >> 1].subframe_tx,
PHY_vars_eNB_g[eNB_inst][0]->proc[slot >> 1].subframe_rx,
PHY_vars_eNB_g[eNB_inst][0]->lte_frame_parms.frame_type,
PHY_vars_eNB_g[eNB_inst][0]->lte_frame_parms.tdd_config,
PHY_vars_eNB_g[eNB_inst][0]->lte_frame_parms.Nid_cell);
*/
}
for (eNB_inst = oai_emulation.info.first_enb_local; for (eNB_inst = oai_emulation.info.first_enb_local;
(eNB_inst (eNB_inst
< (oai_emulation.info.first_enb_local < (oai_emulation.info.first_enb_local
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment