Commit 8c9753ca authored by heshanyun's avatar heshanyun

fix issue about error locking mutex_rxtx of L2 sim

parent 519ab68b
...@@ -333,11 +333,11 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) { ...@@ -333,11 +333,11 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
// wake up TX for subframe n+sf_ahead // wake up TX for subframe n+sf_ahead
// lock the TX mutex and make sure the thread is ready // lock the TX mutex and make sure the thread is ready
if (pthread_mutex_timedlock(&L1_proc->mutex,&wait) != 0) { //if (pthread_mutex_timedlock(&L1_proc->mutex,&wait) != 0) {
LOG_E( PHY, "[eNB] ERROR pthread_mutex_lock for eNB RXTX thread %d (IC %d)\n", L1_proc->subframe_rx&1,L1_proc->instance_cnt ); // LOG_E( PHY, "[eNB] ERROR pthread_mutex_lock for eNB RXTX thread %d (IC %d)\n", L1_proc->subframe_rx&1,L1_proc->instance_cnt );
exit_fun( "error locking mutex_rxtx" ); // exit_fun( "error locking mutex_rxtx" );
return(-1); // return(-1);
} //}
{ {
static uint16_t old_sf = 0; static uint16_t old_sf = 0;
...@@ -405,9 +405,6 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) { ...@@ -405,9 +405,6 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
return(-1); return(-1);
} }
//LOG_D(PHY,"%s() About to attempt pthread_mutex_unlock\n", __FUNCTION__);
pthread_mutex_unlock( &L1_proc->mutex );
//LOG_D(PHY,"%s() UNLOCKED pthread_mutex_unlock\n", __FUNCTION__);
return(0); return(0);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment