CoreCachedSharedPtr: Use synchronization/hazptr instead of experimental/hazptr

Summary: Use synchronization/hazptr instead of experimental/hazptr

Reviewed By: djwatson

Differential Revision: D7565384

fbshipit-source-id: 26790eec80f344cb4b227672e6d51d97c9170dee

folly/concurrency/CoreCachedSharedPtr.h

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 #include <folly/concurrency/AtomicSharedPtr.h>
 #include <folly/concurrency/CacheLocality.h>
 #include <folly/container/Enumerate.h>
-#include <folly/experimental/hazptr/hazptr.h>
+#include <folly/synchronization/Hazptr.h>
 
 namespace folly {
 
@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ class AtomicCoreCachedSharedPtr {
   }
 
   std::shared_ptr<T> get() const {
-    folly::hazptr::hazptr_holder hazptr;
-    auto slots = hazptr.get_protected(slots_);
+    folly::hazptr_local<1> hazptr;
+    auto slots = hazptr[0].get_protected(slots_);
     if (!slots) {
       return nullptr;
     }
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ class AtomicCoreCachedSharedPtr {
 
  private:
   using Holder = std::shared_ptr<T>;
-  struct Slots : folly::hazptr::hazptr_obj_base<Slots> {
+  struct Slots : folly::hazptr_obj_base<Slots> {
     std::array<std::shared_ptr<T>, kNumSlots> slots_;
   };
   std::atomic<Slots*> slots_{nullptr};