Commit 4d897276 authored by Andrii Grynenko's avatar Andrii Grynenko Committed by Sara Golemon

Revert "Revert "Using type-tags for test SingletonVaults""

Summary:
This reverts commit 4893c09795ad4b1187518b184ac4812079039988.

Fix unit test in D1823663.

Test Plan: fbconfig -r folly fbmake dbg

Reviewed By: alikhtarov@fb.com

Subscribers: folly-diffs@, yfeldblum

FB internal diff: D1832645

Signature: t1:1832645:1423267466:6012f1d7700d540c7290c29b01b33148cf91183c
parent 5569e6fa
......@@ -86,11 +86,6 @@ void SingletonVault::reenableInstances() {
state_ = SingletonVaultState::Running;
}
SingletonVault* SingletonVault::singleton() {
static SingletonVault* vault = new SingletonVault();
return vault;
}
void SingletonVault::scheduleDestroyInstances() {
RequestContext::getStaticContext();
......
......@@ -399,7 +399,17 @@ class SingletonVault {
// A well-known vault; you can actually have others, but this is the
// default.
static SingletonVault* singleton();
static SingletonVault* singleton() {
return singleton<>();
}
// Gets singleton vault for any Tag. Non-default tag should be used in unit
// tests only.
template <typename VaultTag = detail::DefaultTag>
static SingletonVault* singleton() {
static SingletonVault* vault = new SingletonVault();
return vault;
}
private:
// The two stages of life for a vault, as mentioned in the class comment.
......@@ -534,7 +544,9 @@ class SingletonVault {
// singletons. Create instances of this class in the global scope of
// type Singleton<T> to register your singleton for later access via
// Singleton<T>::get().
template <typename T, typename Tag = detail::DefaultTag>
template <typename T,
typename Tag = detail::DefaultTag,
typename VaultTag = detail::DefaultTag /* for testing */>
class Singleton {
public:
typedef std::function<T*(void)> CreateFunc;
......@@ -543,9 +555,9 @@ class Singleton {
// Generally your program life cycle should be fine with calling
// get() repeatedly rather than saving the reference, and then not
// call get() during process shutdown.
static T* get(SingletonVault* vault = nullptr /* for testing */) {
static T* get() {
return static_cast<T*>(
(vault ?: SingletonVault::singleton())->get_ptr(typeDescriptor()));
SingletonVault::singleton<VaultTag>()->get_ptr(typeDescriptor()));
}
// Same as get, but should be preffered to it in the same compilation
......@@ -554,7 +566,7 @@ class Singleton {
if (LIKELY(entry_->state == detail::SingletonEntryState::Living)) {
return reinterpret_cast<T*>(entry_->instance_ptr);
} else {
return get(vault_);
return get();
}
}
......@@ -562,10 +574,9 @@ class Singleton {
// singleton, you can try to do so with a weak_ptr. Avoid this when
// possible but the inability to lock the weak pointer can be a
// signal that the vault has been destroyed.
static std::weak_ptr<T> get_weak(
SingletonVault* vault = nullptr /* for testing */) {
static std::weak_ptr<T> get_weak() {
auto weak_void_ptr =
(vault ?: SingletonVault::singleton())->get_weak(typeDescriptor());
(SingletonVault::singleton<VaultTag>())->get_weak(typeDescriptor());
// This is ugly and inefficient, but there's no other way to do it, because
// there's no static_pointer_cast for weak_ptr.
......@@ -588,7 +599,7 @@ class Singleton {
}
return std::static_pointer_cast<T>(shared_void_ptr);
} else {
return get_weak(vault_);
return get_weak();
}
}
......@@ -599,26 +610,19 @@ class Singleton {
T* operator->() { return ptr(); }
explicit Singleton(std::nullptr_t _ = nullptr,
Singleton::TeardownFunc t = nullptr,
SingletonVault* vault = nullptr) :
Singleton ([]() { return new T; },
std::move(t),
vault) {
Singleton::TeardownFunc t = nullptr) :
Singleton ([]() { return new T; }, std::move(t)) {
}
explicit Singleton(Singleton::CreateFunc c,
Singleton::TeardownFunc t = nullptr,
SingletonVault* vault = nullptr) {
Singleton::TeardownFunc t = nullptr) {
if (c == nullptr) {
throw std::logic_error(
"nullptr_t should be passed if you want T to be default constructed");
}
if (vault == nullptr) {
vault = SingletonVault::singleton();
}
auto vault = SingletonVault::singleton<VaultTag>();
vault_ = vault;
entry_ =
&(vault->registerSingleton(typeDescriptor(), c, getTeardownFunc(t)));
}
......@@ -634,22 +638,18 @@ class Singleton {
* regular singletons.
*/
static void make_mock(std::nullptr_t c = nullptr,
typename Singleton<T>::TeardownFunc t = nullptr,
SingletonVault* vault = nullptr /* for testing */ ) {
make_mock([]() { return new T; }, t, vault);
typename Singleton<T>::TeardownFunc t = nullptr) {
make_mock([]() { return new T; }, t);
}
static void make_mock(CreateFunc c,
typename Singleton<T>::TeardownFunc t = nullptr,
SingletonVault* vault = nullptr /* for testing */ ) {
typename Singleton<T>::TeardownFunc t = nullptr) {
if (c == nullptr) {
throw std::logic_error(
"nullptr_t should be passed if you want T to be default constructed");
}
if (vault == nullptr) {
vault = SingletonVault::singleton();
}
auto vault = SingletonVault::singleton<VaultTag>();
vault->registerMockSingleton(
typeDescriptor(),
......@@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ class Singleton {
// We rely on the fact that Singleton destructor won't reset this pointer, so
// it can be "safely" used even after static Singleton object is destroyed.
detail::SingletonEntry* entry_;
SingletonVault* vault_;
};
}
This diff is collapsed.
......@@ -40,12 +40,16 @@ TEST(SingletonVault, singletonReturnsSingletonInstance) {
EXPECT_EQ(c, cpp);
}
struct TestTag {};
template <typename T, typename Tag = folly::detail::DefaultTag>
using SingletonTest = folly::Singleton <T, Tag, TestTag>;
TEST(SingletonVault, singletonsAreCreatedAndDestroyed) {
auto *vault = new folly::SingletonVault();
folly::Singleton<InstanceCounter> counter_singleton(nullptr, nullptr, vault);
auto vault = folly::SingletonVault::singleton<TestTag>();
SingletonTest<InstanceCounter> counter_singleton;
SingletonVault_registrationComplete((SingletonVault_t*) vault);
InstanceCounter *counter = folly::Singleton<InstanceCounter>::get(vault);
InstanceCounter *counter = SingletonTest<InstanceCounter>::get();
EXPECT_EQ(instance_counter_instances, 1);
delete vault;
SingletonVault_destroyInstances((SingletonVault_t*) vault);
EXPECT_EQ(instance_counter_instances, 0);
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment