- 30 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
dearblue authored
Adding `MRB_WORDBOX_NO_FLOAT_TRUNCATE` to the build configuration in 32-bit CPU mode had a double definition. ```console % cat myconf.rb MRuby::Build.new do toolchain "clang" defines << "MRB_WORDBOX_NO_FLOAT_TRUNCATE" cc.flags << "-m32" linker.flags << "-m32" enable_debug end % rake CONFIG=myconf.rb CPP src/array.c -> build/host/src/array.pi In file included from /var/tmp/mruby/src/array.c:7: In file included from /var/tmp/mruby/include/mruby.h:115: In file included from /var/tmp/mruby/include/mruby/value.h:203: /var/tmp/mruby/include/mruby/boxing_word.h:11:10: warning: 'MRB_WORDBOX_NO_FLOAT_TRUNCATE' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined] # define MRB_WORDBOX_NO_FLOAT_TRUNCATE ^ <command line>:3:9: note: previous definition is here #define MRB_WORDBOX_NO_FLOAT_TRUNCATE 1 ^ 1 warning generated. ...SNIP... ```
-
- 26 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
WIP code was mistakenly committed.
-
- 24 Oct, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Make `mrb_static_assert()` a variable argument
-
dearblue authored
`mrb_static_assert()` extends the macro function to take one or two arguments. If the argument is other than that, an error will occur. References: - static_assert のメッセージ省略を許可 - cpprefjp C++日本語リファレンス https://cpprefjp.github.io/lang/cpp17/extending_static_assert.html - c - Overloading Macro on Number of Arguments - Stack Overflow https://stackoverflow.com/a/11763277
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 23 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 22 Oct, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Added testing support for cross-MinGW builds.
-
Chris Reuter authored
This adds a build_config that will cross-build a Windows executable using the MinGW cross-compiler and will also run the unit (i.e. 'rake test') using Wine. For this to work, I made some modifications to the underlying test scripts as well as some minor changes to a couple of the tests themselves.
-
- 21 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 20 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 19 Oct, 2021 6 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Since we have added several new instructions.
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
These instructions call methods of the receiver.
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
* `R(a)` -> `R[a]` * `Pool(a)` -> `Pool[a]` * `Syms(a)` -> `Syms[a]` * `Irep(a)` -> `Irep[a]`
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 18 Oct, 2021 5 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 2.3.4 to 2.3.5
-
dependabot[bot] authored
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 2.3.4 to 2.3.5. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v2.3.4...v2.3.5) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/checkout dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Fix a syntax error in commented-out code
-
YAMAMOTO Yuji authored
By uncommenting the line changed by this commit, `ruby -c build_config/default.rb` complains of a syntax error due to the illegally nested double quotes
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
1024 was too big. Some deep recursion could not be detected before actual stack overflow.
-
- 17 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 16 Oct, 2021 4 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Since `s2` is `NULL` on top-level, it will be an error. No need to generate strict bytecode.
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 15 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Fix grammar in doc/guides/mrbgems.md
-
- 14 Oct, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Need to add `n` because the stack will be shifted in the `mrb_funcall`.
-
John Bampton authored
-
- 12 Oct, 2021 8 commits
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
The Difference Since Ruby1.9, the keyword arguments were emulated by Ruby using the hash object at the bottom of the arguments. But we have gradually moved toward keyword arguments separated from normal (positinal) arguments. At the same time, we value compatibility, so that Ruby3.0 keyword arguments are somewhat compromise. Basically, keyword arguments are separated from positional arguments, except when the method does not take any formal keyword arguments, given keyword arguments (packed in the hash object) are considered as the last argument. And we also allow non symbol keys in the keyword arguments. In that case, those keys are just passed in the `**` hash (or raise `ArgumentError` for unknown keys). The Instruction Changes We have changed `OP_SEND` instruction. `OP_SEND` instruction used to take 3 operands, the register, the symbol, the number of (positional) arguments. The meaning of the third operand has been changed. It is now considered as `n|(nk<<4)`, where `n` is the number of positional arguments, and `nk` is the number of keyword arguments, both occupies 4 bits in the operand. The number `15` in both `n` and `nk` means variable sized arguments are packed in the object. Positional arguments will be packed in the array, and keyword arguments will be packed in the hash object. That means arguments more than 14 values are always packed in the object. Arguments information for other instructions (`OP_SENDB` and `OP_SUPER`) are also changed. It works as the third operand of `OP_SEND`. the difference between `OP_SEND` and `OP_SENDB` is just trivial. It assigns `nil` to the block hidden arguments (right after arguments). The instruction `OP_SENDV` and `OP_SENDVB` are removed. Those instructions are replaced by `OP_SEND` and `OP_SENDB` respectively with the `15` (variable sized) argument information. Calling Convention When calling a method, the stack elements shall be in the order of the receiver of the method, positional arguments, keyword arguments and the block argument. If the number of positional or keyword arugument (`n` or `nk`) is zero, corresponding arguments will be empty. So when `n=0` and `nk=0` the stack layout (from bottom to top) will be: +-----------------------+ | recv | block (or nil) | +-----------------------+ The last elements `block` should be explicitly filled before `OP_SEND` or assigned to `nil` by `OP_SENDB` internally. In other words, the following have exactly same behavior: OP_SENDB clears `block` implicitly: ``` OP_SENDB reg sym 0 ``` OP_SEND clears `block` implicitly: ``` OP_LOADNIL R2 OP_SEND R2 sym 0 ``` When calling a method with only positional arguments (n=0..14) without keyword arguments, the stack layout will be like following: +--------------------------------------------+ | recv | arg1 | ... | arg_n | block (or nil) | +--------------------------------------------+ When calling a method with arguments packed in the array (n=15) which means argument splat (*) is used in the actual arguments, or more than 14 arguments are passed the stack layout will be like following: +-------------------------------+ | recv | array | block (or nil) | +-------------------------------+ The number of the actual arguments is determined by the length of the argument array. When keyword arguments are given (nk>0), keyword arguments are passed between positional arguments and the block argument. For example, when we pass one positional argument `1` and one keyword argument `a: 2`, the stack layout will be like: +------------------------------------+ | recv | 1 | :a | 2 | block (or nil) | +------------------------------------+ Note that keyword arguments consume `2*nk` elements in the stack when `nk=0..14` (unpacked). When calling a method with keyword arguments packed in the hash object (nk=15) which means keyword argument splat (**) is used or more than 14 keyword arguments in the actual arguments, the stack layout will be like: +------------------------------+ | recv | hash | block (or nil) | +------------------------------+ Note for mruby/c When mruby/c authors try to support new keyword arguments, they need to handle the new meaning of the argument information operand. If they choose not to support keyword arguments in mruby/c, it just raise error when `nk` (taken by `(c>>4)&0xf`) is not zero. And combine `OP_SENDV` behavior with `OP_SEND` when `n` is `15`. If they want to support keyword arguments seriously, contact me at <matz@ruby.or.jp> or `@yukihiro_matz`. I can help you.
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
pre-commit autoupdate
-
-
- 10 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
-
- 09 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto authored
Partially allow overriding of `String#[]` methods
-