- 14 Jan, 2014 8 commits
-
-
Robert Edmonds authored
there's not much point to having the "private" definitions split out into a separate header file. they're still in the namespace and there's nothing that can be done to prevent "unauthorized" uses. just integrate the definitions into the main header file but put them in the bottom and note that they're "private". this makes it very slightly easier to copy the protobuf-c support library into another project wholesale, since one less file is required.
-
Robert Edmonds authored
i'm not quite sure what this thing is used for or how useful it could possibly be. it's not used anywhere in protobuf-c or protobuf-c-rpc, and it wasn't in protobuf-c 0.14 or earlier. just delete it; if anything actually needs this kind of logic, it's easy enough to replicate it.
-
Robert Edmonds authored
libraries should never generate output on their own to stdout/stderr. remove the PRINT_UNPACK_ERRORS macro and rename UNPACK_ERROR to PROTOBUF_C_UNPACK_ERROR. the error strings are left in but compiled out by default. they could theoretically be re-enabled for a debugging session by changing the PROTOBUF_C_UNPACK_ERROR macro to something like: #define PROTOBUF_C_UNPACK_ERROR(...) do { fprintf(stderr, __VA_ARGS__); fputc('\n', stderr); } while (0)
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
it might be premature to remove the <google/> prefix from the include path. set up a compatibility symlink so that old code continues to compile.
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
some of these headers aren't used in the protobuf-c code base any more, and in any case the results of these checks (the HAVE_*_H defines in config.h) are not actually used anywhere and the absence of any of these headers doesn't cause configure to fail, so just delete these useless checks.
-
Robert Edmonds authored
protobuf-c: replace DO_ALLOC, FREE, system_alloc, system_free with inline memory allocation functions this reworks memory allocation throughout the support library. the old DO_ALLOC macro had several problems: 1) only by reading the macro implementation is it possible to tell what actually occurs. consider: DO_ALLOC(x, ...); vs.: x = do_alloc(...); only in the latter is it clear that x is being assigned to. 2) it looks like a typical macro/function call, except it alters the control flow, usually by return'ing or executing a goto in the enclosing function. this type of anti-pattern is explicitly called out in the linux kernel coding style. 3) in one instance, setting the destination pointer to NULL is actually a *success* return. in parse_required_member(), when parsing a PROTOBUF_C_TYPE_BYTES wire field, it is possible that the field is present but of zero length, in which case memory shouldn't be allocated and nothing should actually be copied. this is not apparent from reading: DO_ALLOC(bd->data, allocator, len - pref_len, return 0); memcpy(bd->data, data + pref_len, len - pref_len); instead, make this behavior explicit: if (len - pref_len > 0) { bd->data = do_alloc(allocator, len - pref_len); if (bd->data == NULL) return 0; memcpy(bd->data, data + pref_len, len - pref_len); } this is much more readable and makes it possible to write a replacement for DO_ALLOC which returns NULL on failures. this changes the protobuf_c_default_allocator to contain only NULL values; if a replacement function pointer is not present (non-NULL) in this struct, the default malloc/free implementations are used. this makes it impossible to call the default allocator functions directly and represents an API/ABI break, which required a fix to the PROTOBUF_C_BUFFER_SIMPLE_CLEAR macro. despite turning one-line allocations in the simple case: DO_ALLOC(rv, allocator, desc->sizeof_message, return NULL); into three-line statements like: rv = do_alloc(allocator, desc->sizeof_message); if (!rv) return (NULL); this changeset actually *reduces* the total number of lines in the support library.
-
- 13 Jan, 2014 4 commits
-
-
Robert Edmonds authored
in general, libraries shouldn't be responsible for terminating the program if memory allocation fails. if we need to allocate memory and can't, we should be returning a failure indicator, not providing a strange interface to the user for receiving a callback in the event of such an error. also in general, libraries should never write to stdout or stderr. this breaks the API/ABI and will require a note in the ChangeLog.
-
Robert Edmonds authored
i'm confused as to why these fields exist, since the typical implementation of a "temporary alloc" would be something like alloca(), and alloca() is usually just inlined code that adjusts the stack pointer, which is not a function whose address could be taken. this breaks the API/ABI and will require a note in the ChangeLog. possibly we could revisit the idea of "temporary allocations" by using C99 variable length arrays. this would have the advantage of being standardized, unlike alloca().
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
- 11 Jan, 2014 9 commits
-
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
this should silence Coverity #1153648, which complains because tmp.length_prefix_len is uninitialized for certain wire types when copied on line 2486: scanned_member_slabs[which_slab][in_slab_index++] = tmp;
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
dave's original style drives me crazy. reformat the C code in protobuf-c/ with "indent -kr -i8" and manually reflow for readability. try to fit most lines in 80 columns, but due to the lengthy type and function names in protobuf-c, enforcing an 80 column rule would result in a lot of cramped statements, so try to fit lines in up to 100 columns if it would improve readability. (e.g., one <=100 column line is probably better than 3-4 <=80 column lines.) ultimately i'd like to adopt most of the recommendations in the linux coding style: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle. this commit gets us most of the kernel indentation and comment coding style recommendations. later commits will tackle style recommendations that require more intrusive changes: breaking up large functions, replacing macros that affect control flow (e.g., DO_ALLOC). this will hopefully facilitate review and make the code base easier to maintain. i ran the old and new versions of protobuf-c.c through something like: gcc -S -D__PRETTY_FUNCTION__=0 -D__FILE__=0 -D__LINE__=0 -Wall -O0 \ -o protobuf-c.S -c protobuf-c.c and reviewed the diffs of the assembly output to spot any functions that changed, and went back to make sure that any differences were functionally equivalent.
-
- 10 Jan, 2014 7 commits
-
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
- 21 Dec, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
(fixes #26)
-
Nick Galbreath authored
(fixes #106)
-
- 17 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
protoc-c/c_enum.cc: fix compiler warnings protoc-c/c_field.cc: fix compiler warnings
-
- 09 Dec, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Robert Edmonds authored
Signed-off-by: Dave Benson <lahiker42@gmail.com>
-
Robert Edmonds authored
-
- 04 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
better compatibility with 8- and 16-bit platforms (integrate fixes from #47)
-
- 02 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
-
- 28 Nov, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
protobuf_c_dispatch_close_fd() (fixes #82)
-
- 27 Nov, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
check for server closures (responses) to not crash the server in case of a malformed message (related to #76)
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
protobuf_c_message_check
-
- 23 Nov, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ilya Lipnitskiy authored
leave a dangling pointer to the parsed submessage
-