Commit 8b881ed1 authored by Cedric Roux's avatar Cedric Roux

better (maybe) freeing of RA process when an UE is removed from MAC

The RA process may be in the state:
RA_active == FALSE and wait_ack_Msg4 == 1

Testing only the rnti should be enough, if everything else works
properly.

Also, don't break, just in case. (Not sure it makes a
difference.)
parent 845f4ef8
...@@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ int rrc_mac_remove_ue(module_id_t mod_idP,rnti_t rntiP) ...@@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ int rrc_mac_remove_ue(module_id_t mod_idP,rnti_t rntiP)
RA_TEMPLATE *RA_template; RA_TEMPLATE *RA_template;
for (i=0;i<NB_RA_PROC_MAX;i++) { for (i=0;i<NB_RA_PROC_MAX;i++) {
RA_template = (RA_TEMPLATE *)&eNB_mac_inst[mod_idP].common_channels[pCC_id].RA_template[i]; RA_template = (RA_TEMPLATE *)&eNB_mac_inst[mod_idP].common_channels[pCC_id].RA_template[i];
if ((RA_template->RA_active == TRUE) && if (RA_template->rnti == rntiP){
(RA_template->rnti == rntiP)){
RA_template->RA_active=FALSE; RA_template->RA_active=FALSE;
RA_template->generate_rar=0; RA_template->generate_rar=0;
RA_template->generate_Msg4=0; RA_template->generate_Msg4=0;
...@@ -374,7 +373,7 @@ int rrc_mac_remove_ue(module_id_t mod_idP,rnti_t rntiP) ...@@ -374,7 +373,7 @@ int rrc_mac_remove_ue(module_id_t mod_idP,rnti_t rntiP)
RA_template->timing_offset=0; RA_template->timing_offset=0;
RA_template->RRC_timer=20; RA_template->RRC_timer=20;
RA_template->rnti = 0; RA_template->rnti = 0;
break; //break;
} }
} }
if (ret == 0) { if (ret == 0) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment