Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
O
OpenXG UE
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lizhongxiao
OpenXG UE
Commits
795e2b99
Commit
795e2b99
authored
Jul 25, 2020
by
Aniq
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
linked the new unpack message fns in check_unpack_length()
parent
03a9d1b9
Changes
5
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
5 changed files
with
40 additions
and
12 deletions
+40
-12
.vscode/launch.json
.vscode/launch.json
+2
-1
nfapi/README.md
nfapi/README.md
+22
-6
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
+9
-2
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
+1
-1
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
+6
-2
No files found.
.vscode/launch.json
View file @
795e2b99
...
...
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@
"/home/glab/NR_nfapi/openairinterface5g/targets/PROJECTS/GENERIC-LTE-EPC/CONF/gnb.band78.tm1.106PRB.usrpx300.conf"
,
"--rfsim"
,
"--rfsimulator.serveraddr"
,
"server"
],
"server"
,
"--phy-test"
],
"stopAtEntry"
:
false
,
"cwd"
:
"${workspaceFolder}"
,
"environment"
:
[],
...
...
nfapi/README.md
View file @
795e2b99
...
...
@@ -39,20 +39,36 @@ sudo <oai_codebase>/cmake_targets/ran_build/build/nr-softmodem -O <oai_codebase>
*
`unpack_tx_data_request`
*
Similarly change all the
`unpack`
functions within the switch-case block.
*
Modify the behaviour of
`check_unpack_length()`
for the new
`TAGS`
*
this is where the unpack functions are called
*
`dl_tti_request`
[x]
*
`ul_tti_request`
*
`ul_dci_request`
*
`tx_data_request`
### Task-C
*
Write the
`dl_tti`
alternative for
`nfapi_vnf_p7_dl_config_req()`
in
`vnf_p7_interface.c`
and other such functions.
*
Also check the function
`vnf_p7_pack_and_send_p7_msg()`
in
`vnf_p7.c`
for upgrade.
*
Write the
`dl_tti`
equivalent for
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
in
`nfapi_vnf.c`
and other such functions.
*
Check if
`nr_schedule_response()`
needs to be upgraded
*
Write the
`ul_tti`
alternative for
`nfapi_vnf_p7_ul_config_req()`
in
`vnf_p7_interface.c`
and other such functions.
*
`dl_tti`
is present as
`nr_dl_config`
[x]
*
`ul_tti`
*
`ul_dci`
*
`tx_data`
*
Resolve the hard-coded areas in source code. [
`HIGH-PRIORITY`
] [x]
*
Check whether the code can support latency of 0.5 ms for oai_slot_indication
*
Write the
`ul_tti`
equivalent for
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
in
`nfapi_vnf.c`
and other such functions.
*
`dl_tti`
is present as
`nr_dl_config`
[x]
*
`ul_tti`
*
`ul_dci`
*
`tx_data`
*
Check if
`nr_schedule_response()`
needs to be upgraded [x]
*
only a couple of
`NFAPI_MODE!=VNF_MODE`
checks
*can be added*
before calling the functions to handle PDUs
*
we need to add
`NFAPI_MODE!=MONOLITHIC`
checks before
`oai_nfapi_dl_config_req`
and other such fns [x]
*
Sync with the latest stable commit in
`develop`
branch [
`LOW-PRIORITY`
]
*
check deviations
### Testing
*
Test by running VNF on a terminal and PNF in rfsim parallely
*
If all works fine, move to UE testing.
*
Check if the
`FAPI`
core functionality is not broken by running gNB in monolithic mode
*
Sync with the latest stable commit in
`develop`
branch [
`HIGH-PRIORITY`
]
*
Check whether the code can support latency of 0.5 ms for oai_slot_indication
*
Testing with a UE
*
Run VNF
...
...
nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/src/nfapi_p7.c
View file @
795e2b99
...
...
@@ -6858,14 +6858,21 @@ int nfapi_p7_message_unpack(void *pMessageBuf, uint32_t messageBufLen, void *pUn
// look for the specific message
switch
(
pMessageHeader
->
message_id
)
{
{
case
NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST
:
if
(
check_unpack_length
(
NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST
,
unpackedBufLen
))
result
=
unpack_dl_tti_request
(
&
pReadPackedMessage
,
end
,
pMessageHeader
,
config
);
else
return
-
1
;
break
;
#if 0
case NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_REQUEST:
if (check_unpack_length(NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_REQUEST, unpackedBufLen))
result = unpack_dl_config_request(&pReadPackedMessage, end, pMessageHeader, config);
else
return -1;
break;
#endif
case
NFAPI_UL_CONFIG_REQUEST
:
if
(
check_unpack_length
(
NFAPI_UL_CONFIG_REQUEST
,
unpackedBufLen
))
result
=
unpack_ul_config_request
(
&
pReadPackedMessage
,
end
,
pMessageHeader
,
config
);
...
...
nfapi/open-nFAPI/pnf/src/pnf_p7.c
View file @
795e2b99
...
...
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ int pnf_p7_slot_ind(pnf_p7_t* pnf_p7, uint16_t phy_id, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sl
// If we ever need to "send" a dummy ul_config this won't work!!!
// send_dummy_subframe(pnf_p7, sfn_sf_tx);
send_dummy_slot
(
pnf_p7
,
sfn_tx
,
slot_tx
);
//
send_dummy_slot(pnf_p7, sfn_tx, slot_tx);
}
...
...
openair1/SCHED_NR/fapi_nr_l1.c
View file @
795e2b99
...
...
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
switch
(
dl_tti_pdu
->
PDUType
)
{
case
NFAPI_NR_DL_TTI_SSB_PDU_TYPE
:
gNB
->
pbch_configured
=
1
;
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nr_nfapi_ssb_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
dl_tti_pdu
);
...
...
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
case
NFAPI_NR_DL_TTI_PDCCH_PDU_TYPE
:
AssertFatal
(
pdcch_received
==
0
,
"pdcch_received is not 0, we can only handle one PDCCH PDU per slot
\n
"
);
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nfapi_nr_pdcch_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
&
dl_tti_pdu
->
pdcch_pdu
);
...
...
@@ -191,13 +192,16 @@ void nr_schedule_response(NR_Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO){
AssertFatal
(
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
num_TLV
==
1
,
"TX_req->pdu_list[%d].num_TLV %d != 1
\n
"
,
pduIndex
,
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
num_TLV
);
uint8_t
*
sdu
=
(
uint8_t
*
)
TX_req
->
pdu_list
[
pduIndex
].
TLVs
[
0
].
value
.
direct
;
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) ?
handle_nr_nfapi_pdsch_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
&
dl_tti_pdu
->
pdsch_pdu
,
sdu
);
}
}
}
if
(
UL_tti_req
!=
NULL
)
memcpy
(
&
gNB
->
UL_tti_req
,
UL_tti_req
,
sizeof
(
nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t
));
if
(
UL_tti_req
!=
NULL
)
memcpy
(
&
gNB
->
UL_tti_req
,
UL_tti_req
,
sizeof
(
nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t
));
// if (NFAPI_MODE!=NFAPI_MODE_VNF) //should we enclose the for in this?
for
(
int
i
=
0
;
i
<
number_ul_dci_pdu
;
i
++
)
{
handle_nfapi_nr_ul_dci_pdu
(
gNB
,
frame
,
slot
,
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment