- 13 Feb, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
Correctly show the path: it was missing cmake_targets/, although it is there. Closes: #733
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
- 12 Feb, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
- 09 Feb, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
- 08 Feb, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
francescomani authored
-
francescomani authored
-
francescomani authored
-
- 07 Feb, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Teodora authored
-
Teodora authored
- create hash table to save ric_req_id (key) and array of ran_param_id(s) (values), per each subscription - create RB tree to store list of ric_req_id(s) for each ran_param_id => when the async event occurs, it is easier and faster to search per ran_param_id and send the indication message to all xApps (ric_req_id(s)) subscribed to the same ran_param_id - it is important to mention that both data structures need to be maintained, especially when unsubscription occurs (free_aperiodic_subscription)
-
Teodora authored
- subscribe to "UE RRC State Change" RAN Parameter ID - expected asynchronous events from E2 node
-
- 06 Feb, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
Robert Schmidt authored
Integration: 2024.w05 See merge request oai/openairinterface5g!2549 * !2537 Fix for UE PUSCH scheduler DURATION_RX_TO_TX assertion * !2538 Fix for UE MAC PDU LCID handling * !2542 Fix L1_SSB_CSI_RSRP table mapping and check validity * !2544 NR UE RRC timers improvement * !2546 Correcting the location of packages * !2493 Fix for computing SSB subcarrier offset * !2496 MCS for retransmission fix in case of dci failed detection at NR UE * !2503 Handle PDU Sessions in NG Initial UE context Setup and forward 5G-S-TMSI to core * enable caching in the docker build of the CI build steps * !2541 Fix RA bug, improve overall logging
-
- 05 Feb, 2024 6 commits
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/NR_UE_fix_no_mcs_dci_failed_detection' into integration_2024_w05
-
Jaroslava Fiedlerova authored
-
- 03 Feb, 2024 17 commits
-
-
Robert Schmidt authored
We used to trigger the UECapabilityEnquiry right after SecurityModeComplete, and before the RRCReconfiguration (which we call "default" reconfiguration). However, 38.401 tells us that we should send the RRCReconfiguration right after the SecurityModeComplete. In fact, even though we get the UE capabilities, we cannot use them during this reconfiguration, as we would first need to update the DU with a UE Context Modification Request, which we cannot, as we just sent the UE Context Setup Request, and the DU relies on first getting the RRCReconfiguration. Since we rely on a subsequent reconfiguration anyway, we can safely trigger the UECapabilityEnquiry after RRCReconfigurationComplete. (38.331 also says we can send UECapabilityEnquiry at any point.) To cater for the possibility that there might not be any reconfiguration coming afterwards, we check if a DRB has been set up. If not, we assume a reconfiguration will come, and do not trigger one only for the UE capabilities (this is what we do before this commit). If we already have DRBs set up, they might have been set up during the "default" RRC Reconfiguration, and another reconfiguration might not follow soon; in this case, we trigger the reconfiguration by sending the UE capabilities to the DU right away.
-
Robert Schmidt authored
The next commit moves the UE Capability Enquiry after the first reconfiguration. This has the effect that for some UEs (e.g., iPhone), the Setup Requests come too close to each other, triggering RRC Reconfigurations while previous transactions are ongoing. I think the "true" solution would be to implement some tracking of transactions across RRC, F1AP, E1AP, but this might require many changes. For the moment, limit to delaying PDU session resource setups to prevent above problem. Delaying is done using ITTI timers (to be able to serve other UEs), waiting 10ms each time, up to 20 times (to not deadlock the transaction -- after all, if the UE is unhappy, it will drop the connection).
-
Robert Schmidt authored
- Put consistently transaction IDs - Remove transaction IDs when transaction finished, or in places that do not trigger an RRC transaction
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
This commit allows the gNB to handle PDU sessions that the core requests to setup during the NGAP Initial UE Context Setup. Previously, we only managed them as part of PDU Session Resource Setup Request. The RRC will, depending on whether a PDU session is in the NGAP Initial UE Context Setup, either directly trigger the Security Command, or first do a bearer setup at the CU-UP. Some asserts have been lifted, as now the PDU sessions might be present before the RRC Connection is fully established. Implement the correct forwarding of the bearers in an F1 UE Context Setup Request message. This solves bug #672.
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
Prior to this commit, the handling of DRBs is complex: first the RRC "guessed" a DRB ID when setting up DRBs via E1AP (in rrc_gNB_process_NGAP_PDUSESSION_SETUP_REQ()), and later chose one for real in fill_DRB_Configlist() (called in rrc_gNB_generate_dedicatedRRCReconfiguration()). To simplify, remove fill_DRB_Configlist(), and instead allocate the DRB using generateDRB() before sending the message via E1AP, in rrc_gNB_generate_dedicatedRRCReconfiguration(). The rest of the logic is the same. For PDU sessions, always mark PDU sessions as "done" to match pdu session state logic.
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
It might happen that a UE has no CU-UP (e.g., never requested a PDU session). When triggering a release, we previously and implicitly associated a CU-UP in that case. That is not good, and confusing. This commit adds a function to look up if the UE has an associated CU-UP. We only send a release if it is the case. The function get_existing_cuup_for_ue() now instead verifies that a CU-UP exist, and does not implicitly create an association (which might be unwanted, see above).
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
The number of tunnels corresponds to number of DRBs, so correctly compare tunnels and DRBs.
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-
Robert Schmidt authored
-