That led to uplink two resource blocks to fail being decoded (not always),
due to wrong channel estimation. (As was the previous hotfix for five
resource blocks.)

This commit also includes some cleanup of some historical code that is
not relevant anymore.

the bigger prime number lower than 60 is 59, not 50

Merge branch 'feature-34-test_framework' of https://gitlab.eurecom.fr/oai/openairinterface5g into feature-34-test_framework

The distinction common space/user space still requires some
careful examination.

T

I did some compilation tests using `./build_oai -s --run-group "0101*"`, all was fine.

I ran `lte-softmodem` with the sequans and let it run for a while with both
uplink and downlink UDP low throughput traffic, all was fine.

I ran some TCP tests, downlink 14 Mb/s (because the sequans does not report
a CQI of 15 but 14 maximum, so we don't go to maximum MCS, so 14 Mb/s instead
of 16) with a very clean radio (almost no error in the HARQ processes).

For uplink things are not so clean, it starts at 6 Mb/s and after a while goes
down to 2/3 Mbit/s. Lot's of errors in the HARQ processes, mostly uplink but
also downlink.

This is a both with and without T activated.

So to me it's fine.

The T tracer is a debugging tool. When it's not enabled,
it has zero impact on the processing. I think we need to
do very little tests before merging. I'll let you decide
but to me it's okay!

See merge request !36

if you compile *without* T it fails because the T macro is interpreted
as a function call

Conflicts:
	cmake_targets/CMakeLists.txt
	cmake_targets/build_oai
	openair1/PHY/LTE_TRANSPORT/pucch.c
	openair1/SCHED/phy_procedures_lte_eNb.c
	openair2/LAYER2/MAC/eNB_scheduler_ulsch.c
	targets/RT/USER/lte-softmodem.c

very basic, to be refined, find a nice way to display (plot? text?)
protocol data movement

to be refined, it's rough