- 13 Aug, 2021 1 commit
-
-
francescomani authored
-
- 03 Aug, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
- Fix the SA RF test (wrong conf file) - No more copy of RAW files in SA - Fix no-detection of failures on RA Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
- 02 Aug, 2021 5 commits
-
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
integration_2021_wk31 See merge request oai/openairinterface5g!1219
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
-
- 29 Jul, 2021 3 commits
-
-
hardy authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
hardy authored
-
- 28 Jul, 2021 2 commits
-
-
hardy authored
-
Remi Hardy authored
-
- 27 Jul, 2021 4 commits
- 26 Jul, 2021 3 commits
-
-
hardy authored
-
hardy authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
- 25 Jul, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Remi Hardy authored
MR !1206 : nr_ue_remove_high_speed_flag This flag is always set to 1, With multiple DMRS symbols configuration, very recent DMRS containing symbol shall be for channel estimation. MR !1205 : fix-lte-ue-modem-in-docker-container We bind the socket to any_addr (instead of localhost), so the commands to the UE can come also from a remote machine MR !1178 : NR_CSIRS_tomerge Implementation of CSI RS transmission at gNB MR !1211 : develop-NSA_SA_fixes Small fixes for NSA and SA
-
- 24 Jul, 2021 1 commit
-
-
hardy authored
-
- 23 Jul, 2021 7 commits
-
-
hardy authored
-
rmagueta authored
-
hardy authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
hardy authored
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix-lte-ue-modem-in-docker-container' into integration_2021_wk30
-
hardy authored
-
hardy authored
-
- 22 Jul, 2021 11 commits
-
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
Raphael Defosseux authored
Signed-off-by: Raphael Defosseux <raphael.defosseux@eurecom.fr>
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
luis_pereira87 authored
-
hardy authored
-
hardy authored
-
Remi Hardy authored
MR !1193 : Update for 5G SA implementation
-
francescomani authored
-
- 21 Jul, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Cedric Roux authored
When there is a retransmission, we want to use the same number of RBs. The RBs are allocated by groups (RBGs). In some cases (like a cell with 25 PRBs), the last RBG contains less RBs. So in case of a retransmission, if this last RBG was used before we need to reuse it to have the same number of RBs. If not, we will use more RBs for the retransmission than the previous transmission. In an experiment with two UEs (quectel modules) it was seen that when a retransmission happens with a different number of RBs then the UE is not happy at all, leading to way more NACKs in the harq processes than should happen (actually the first NACK was not a NACK at all, but the eNB did interpret it as a NACK; so the next transmission should simply be discarded by the UE that successfully received the first transmission; instead the UE fails to decode the data and sends a NACK, a real one this time). Maybe it's not the correct solution, but it improve things, there are much less NACKs.
-