Commit 543dd50c authored by Robert Schmidt's avatar Robert Schmidt

Rewrite PUCCH allocation (simplified, restricted)

- No dynamic allocation of PUCCH structures
- Use first PUCCH for HARQ (can only allocate for up to two slots in
  single PUCCH, simplistic nr_acknack_scheduling!)
- Use second PUCCH for CSI, do not multiplex!
parent 47b28400
......@@ -442,15 +442,10 @@ void nr_simple_dlsch_preprocessor(module_id_t module_id,
UE_info->num_pdcch_cand[UE_id][cid]++;
/* Find PUCCH occasion */
nr_acknack_scheduling(module_id,
UE_id,
frame,
slot,
num_slots_per_tdd,
&sched_ctrl->pucch_sched_idx,
&sched_ctrl->pucch_occ_idx);
AssertFatal(sched_ctrl->pucch_sched_idx >= 0, "no uplink slot for PUCCH found!\n");
const bool alloc = nr_acknack_scheduling(module_id, UE_id, frame, slot);
AssertFatal(alloc,
"could not find uplink slot for PUCCH (RNTI %04x@%d.%d)!\n",
rnti, frame, slot);
uint16_t *vrb_map = RC.nrmac[module_id]->common_channels[CC_id].vrb_map;
// for now HARQ PID is fixed and should be the same as in post-processor
......@@ -588,7 +583,7 @@ void nr_schedule_ue_spec(module_id_t module_id,
const int current_harq_pid = slot % num_slots_per_tdd;
NR_UE_harq_t *harq = &sched_ctrl->harq_processes[current_harq_pid];
NR_sched_pucch_t *pucch = &sched_ctrl->sched_pucch[sched_ctrl->pucch_sched_idx][sched_ctrl->pucch_occ_idx];
NR_sched_pucch_t *pucch = &sched_ctrl->sched_pucch[0];
harq->feedback_slot = pucch->ul_slot;
harq->is_waiting = 1;
UE_info->mac_stats[UE_id].dlsch_rounds[harq->round]++;
......
......@@ -329,14 +329,10 @@ void nr_preprocessor_phytest(module_id_t module_id,
__func__,
UE_id);
nr_acknack_scheduling(module_id,
UE_id,
frame,
slot,
num_slots_per_tdd,
&sched_ctrl->pucch_sched_idx,
&sched_ctrl->pucch_occ_idx);
AssertFatal(sched_ctrl->pucch_sched_idx >= 0, "no uplink slot for PUCCH found!\n");
const bool alloc = nr_acknack_scheduling(module_id, UE_id, frame, slot);
AssertFatal(alloc,
"could not find uplink slot for PUCCH (RNTI %04x@%d.%d)!\n",
rnti, frame, slot);
sched_ctrl->rbStart = rbStart;
sched_ctrl->rbSize = rbSize;
......
......@@ -1863,16 +1863,6 @@ int add_new_nr_ue(module_id_t mod_idP, rnti_t rntiP){
UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].ul_rssi = 0;
/* set illegal time domain allocation to force recomputation of all fields */
UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].pusch_save.time_domain_allocation = -1;
UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].sched_pucch = (NR_sched_pucch_t **)malloc(num_slots_ul*sizeof(NR_sched_pucch_t *));
for (int s=0; s<num_slots_ul;s++)
UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].sched_pucch[s] = (NR_sched_pucch_t *)malloc(2*sizeof(NR_sched_pucch_t));
for (int k=0; k<num_slots_ul; k++) {
for (int l=0; l<2; l++)
memset((void *) &UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].sched_pucch[k][l],
0,
sizeof(NR_sched_pucch_t));
}
LOG_I(MAC, "gNB %d] Add NR UE_id %d : rnti %x\n",
mod_idP,
UE_id,
......@@ -1912,7 +1902,6 @@ void mac_remove_nr_ue(module_id_t mod_id, rnti_t rnti)
UE_info->active[UE_id] = FALSE;
UE_info->rnti[UE_id] = 0;
remove_nr_ue_list(&UE_info->list, UE_id);
free(UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id].sched_pucch);
memset((void *) &UE_info->UE_sched_ctrl[UE_id],
0,
sizeof(NR_UE_sched_ctrl_t));
......
......@@ -215,15 +215,10 @@ void nr_csi_meas_reporting(int Mod_idP,
int ul_slots,
int n_slots_frame);
void nr_acknack_scheduling(int Mod_idP,
bool nr_acknack_scheduling(int Mod_idP,
int UE_id,
frame_t frameP,
sub_frame_t slotP,
int slots_per_tdd,
int *pucch_id,
int *pucch_occ);
int get_pucch_resource(NR_UE_info_t *UE_info,int UE_id,int k,int l);
sub_frame_t slotP);
void get_pdsch_to_harq_feedback(int Mod_idP,
int UE_id,
......
......@@ -385,10 +385,12 @@ typedef struct {
/// the currently active BWP in UL
NR_BWP_Uplink_t *active_ubwp;
NR_sched_pucch_t **sched_pucch;
/// selected PUCCH index, if scheduled
int pucch_sched_idx;
int pucch_occ_idx;
/// PUCCH scheduling information. Array of two, we assume for the moment:
/// HARQ (and SR) in the first field, CSI in second (as fixed by RRC conf.,
/// i.e. if actually present). The order is important for
/// nr_acknack_scheduling()!
NR_sched_pucch_t sched_pucch[2];
NR_sched_pusch_save_t pusch_save;
NR_sched_pusch_t sched_pusch;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment