Commit 96c12c86 authored by Younes's avatar Younes

some conditions for TDD which were asserting after latest NFAPI merge.

parent 4695d16c
...@@ -6556,7 +6556,7 @@ uint8_t pdcch_alloc2ul_subframe(LTE_DL_FRAME_PARMS *frame_parms,uint8_t n) ...@@ -6556,7 +6556,7 @@ uint8_t pdcch_alloc2ul_subframe(LTE_DL_FRAME_PARMS *frame_parms,uint8_t n)
else else
ul_subframe = ((n+4)%10); ul_subframe = ((n+4)%10);
AssertFatal(frame_parms->frame_type == FDD || subframe_select(frame_parms,ul_subframe) == SF_UL,"illegal ul_subframe %d (n %d)\n",ul_subframe,n); if (frame_parms->frame_type == TDD && subframe_select(frame_parms,ul_subframe) != SF_UL) ul_subframe=255;
LOG_D(PHY, "subframe %d: PUSCH subframe = %d\n", n, ul_subframe); LOG_D(PHY, "subframe %d: PUSCH subframe = %d\n", n, ul_subframe);
return ul_subframe; return ul_subframe;
......
...@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ void schedule_response(Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO) ...@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ void schedule_response(Sched_Rsp_t *Sched_INFO)
NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(DL_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(DL_req->sfn_sf),number_dl_pdu, NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(DL_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(DL_req->sfn_sf),number_dl_pdu,
NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(TX_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(TX_req->sfn_sf),TX_req->tx_request_body.number_of_pdus, NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(TX_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(TX_req->sfn_sf),TX_req->tx_request_body.number_of_pdus,
NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(HI_DCI0_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(HI_DCI0_req->sfn_sf),number_hi_dci0_pdu, NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(HI_DCI0_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(HI_DCI0_req->sfn_sf),number_hi_dci0_pdu,
NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(UL_req->sfn_sf),NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(UL_req->sfn_sf),number_ul_pdu, UL_req!=NULL ? NFAPI_SFNSF2SFN(UL_req->sfn_sf) : 0,number_ul_pdu,
eNB->pdcch_vars[subframe&1].num_pdcch_symbols); eNB->pdcch_vars[subframe&1].num_pdcch_symbols);
int do_oai =0; int do_oai =0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment