An error occurred fetching the project authors.
  1. 14 Feb, 2021 2 commits
  2. 13 Oct, 2020 1 commit
    • Robert Schmidt's avatar
      Remove Mutexes in phy_stub_UE.c · 98824606
      Robert Schmidt authored
      Various mutexes are present in the phy_stub_UE.c file. However, it will
      only be run in a single thread; the multiple-thread implementation also
      runs the higher layers concurrently, which leads to races and segfaults.
      Therefore, remove these mutexes, as we don't need them.
      98824606
  3. 01 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  4. 06 Mar, 2020 1 commit
  5. 02 Mar, 2020 1 commit
  6. 13 Jan, 2020 1 commit
  7. 30 Oct, 2019 1 commit
  8. 18 Oct, 2019 1 commit
  9. 23 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  10. 14 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  11. 18 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  12. 14 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  13. 08 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  14. 22 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  15. 07 Jan, 2019 1 commit
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      fix a lot of file mode · aea6b4b5
      Cedric Roux authored
      For whatever reason most of the files had their permission
      changed from 644 to 755, which is not wanted.
      aea6b4b5
  16. 22 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  17. 17 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  18. 16 Apr, 2018 1 commit
    • Bi-Ruei, Chiu's avatar
      Compare version number using MAKE_VERSION macro to provide better SW configuration: · 5c23af77
      Bi-Ruei, Chiu authored
      1. Previous SW configuration for different RRC version relies on whether macro Rel10,
         Rel14 defined or not by checking #ifdef Rel14 or #if defined(Rel10) || defined(R14).
         Whenever there is a newer RRC version, e.g. Rel15, it will be very a tedious and
         error-prone job to add defined(Rel15) in every place.
      
      2. Some RRC messages are defined in release 13 instead of release 14, NB-IoT
         feature is one of such example. Our code shall reflect this fact instead of using
         an afterward version number in software configuration.
      
      3. Some RRC messages or some fields of certain RRC messages are added in the middle
         a release, e.g. SystemInformationBlockType1_v1310_IEs_t defined in RRC 13.1.0
         and RRC 9.2.0 made some changes to SIB12 and SIB13 so we have sib12_v920 and
         sib13_v920 fields in SIB12 and SIB13's struct.
         We need a finer grain of control when using ASN1 from different RRC version.
      
      4. S1AP also has this problem that it use UPDATE_RELEASE_9 and UPDATE_RELEASE_10 to
         differentiate between various S1AP version.
      
      This commit propose using MAKE_VERSION(x,y,z) to designate the version number and
      modify current conditional compilation accordingly.
      
      Note: 2018/04/16, Modified based on Cedric's comment.
      5c23af77
  19. 08 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  20. 09 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  21. 15 Jan, 2018 1 commit
    • Cedric Roux's avatar
      import NFAPI work from David Price from Cisco (non-working commit, do not use it) · 7757b9e7
      Cedric Roux authored
      It has been chosen to not include the full history of commits
      from David. He included a binary version of wireshark, probably
      a modified one that understands NFAPI. Wireshark is released under
      the GPL license, we cannot include it in the repository. We could
      have done a next commit to remove this binary. But then it would
      still be present in the history of commits, which may not be allowed.
      And it would take space on disk. We could edit the history to remove
      wireshark entirely. But this operation is too complicated.
      
      There was also a pcap capture file, which has nothing to do in
      the history of commits and would take space on disk. There again,
      it's too difficult to edit the history to remove it.
      
      There was a file .gitignore that was also removed.
      
      The original history can be found on David's repository:
      https://gitlab.eurecom.fr/daveprice/openairinterface5g/
      The branch is: nfapi-ru-rau-split.
      
      A copy of that branch has been included in the internal OAI
      repository, for those who have access to it.
      The branch is the same. The last commit ID is
      9106438239e0bc626ff1fa1d97d911caadd0fbb9.
      
      You can compare the current commit with the commit 9106...
      to see what differs.
      
      The current commit has to be considered non-working.
      The commit following the current commit will fix problems with
      the work in the current commit.
      
      If you use git bisect, don't spend time analyzing the current
      commit.
      7757b9e7
  22. 14 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  23. 14 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  24. 08 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  25. 19 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  26. 06 Jul, 2017 1 commit